Archive | One Child Policy RSS feed for this section

No.13 Rep. Chris Smith upbraids Clinton, Obama for silence on China’s female ‘gendercide’ | LifeSiteNews.com

25 Apr

Rep. Chris Smith upbraids Clinton, Obama for silence on China’s female ‘gendercide’ | LifeSiteNews.com.

No.12 How to evaluate the One Child Policy?

25 Apr

I interviewed an Indian and a Chinese who was born in the UK, and asked them how do they think about the policy. 

We have to admit that the One Child Policy has some advantages forChina’s society. However, it still got criticism from international society. Chris Smith, who is U.S. Republican congressman, he attacked the policy as the most Violation of human rights in recent 30 years. He said there was no government did human rights violation likeChina’s government. He pointed that there were many girls baby and children got grievous injury by One Child Policy. He encouraged U.S government continues to pressure and try to make the ruling party inChinawhich is CCP to give up the policy. 

In 2002,Chinaoutlawed the use of physical force to make a woman submit to an abortion or sterilization, but it is not entirely enforced. In the execution of the policy, many local governments still demand abortions if the pregnancy violates local regulations.

The policy caused many social problems as well:

The “four-two-one” problem, it means a family of two only child needs to support for his or her two parents even include grand parents. Also, they still need to support their child as well. It is a huge pressure for a young family.

Effects on female population, it means in the country like China, which has long tradition of son preference, people more prefer to have a son over daughter because male is helpful for farm work and Chinese traditionally hold that daughters, on their marriage, become primarily part of the groom’s family. Therefore it leads to some pregnant women perform abortions if the baby’s sex is female. The sex ratio at birth (between male and female births) in mainlandChina reached 117:100 in the year 2000, substantially higher than the natural baseline, which ranges between 103:100 and 107:100. It will be serious social problem in the future.

(available at:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chinapop.svg)

For me, as a Chinese which is one of the first generation since One Child Policy started, I could understand why the government did it. The basic purpose is for the national benefit. I think the positive reviews and negative reviews are from two different ideologies.China’s government puts the national benefits before all things even human rights. Probably, One Child Policy is helpful forChinain a curtain extent but it is definitely human rights violation. However, heChina’s government reviewed the policy and expressed considerations to allow for couples to have a second child. I think every thing will be better in the future.

No.11 China’s One Child Policy

25 Apr

InChina, the one child policy was introduced to stabilize the country’s population. It officially restricts the number of children married urban couples can have to one, although it allows exemptions for several cases, including rural couples, ethnic minorities, and parents without any siblings themselves. More than twenty years after it introduced its one-child policy,Chinais keeping its promise, allowing only-children who marry each other to have a second child.

 

(available at: http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.sovereignindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/China-One-Child-Policy.bmp&imgrefurl=http://www.sovereignindependent.com/%3Fp%3D8978&usg=__R_GvucMKGZR52K2ik9CAVQQMqwg=&h=198&w=303&sz=177&hl=zh-CN&start=0&sig2=LznHGgLiRGmVNetMHWCfWQ&zoom=1&tbnid=DqsyowNlnuyggM:&tbnh=118&tbnw=181&ei=HuC1TZmVBMWv8gPdpayWDA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Done%2Bchild%2Bpolicy%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dzh-CN%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1209%26bih%3D605%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=437&page=1&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0&tx=51&ty=72)

Maybe it is an unfathomed policy for western people, but it really good effect on China’s population and economy. After the introduction of the one-child policy, the fertility rate in China fell from over three births per woman in 1980 (already a sharp reduction from more than five births per woman in the early 1970s) to approximately 1.8 births in 2008.

 The Chinese government estimates that it had three to four hundred million fewer people in 2008 with the one-child policy, than it would have had otherwise. Chinese authorities thus consider the policy as a great success in helping to implementChina’s current economic growth. The reduction in the fertility rate and thus population growth has reduced the severity of problems that come with overpopulation, like epidemics, slums, overwhelmed social services (such as health, education, law enforcement), and strain on the ecosystem from abuse of fertile land and production of high volumes of waste. Even with the one-child policy in place,Chinastill has one million more births than deaths every five weeks.

 

(available at:http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.cefc.com.hk/uf/image/Photos%2520diverses%2520PC%2520CP/CR%2520JUDD%2520Greenhalgh%2520Susan%2520Just%2520One%2520Child%2520net.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cefc.com.hk/pccpa.php%3Faid%3D2420&usg=__OHp1be8zbYgo13fRMJxPoiEveL8=&h=631&w=414&sz=138&hl=zh-CN&start=397&sig2=x4gOh5x-waQ0RXAyIdvhpg&zoom=1&tbnid=25HDxkS63lWDuM:&tbnh=145&tbnw=96&ei=f-C1TfWtK4rF8QPiysmVDA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Done%2Bchild%2Bpolicy%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dzh-CN%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1209%26bih%3D605%26tbm%3Disch&chk=sbg&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=47&page=24&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:397&tx=64&ty=41)

It is fact that The One Child Policy got non-population-related benefits as well:

Because of the decrease of pregnancy, it helps provide a better health service for women and a reduction in the risks of death and injury associated with pregnancy. In addition, people can get free condoms or contraception at family planning offices and pregnant women can have free pre-natal classes as well. The individual savings rate has increased since the one-child policy was introduced. This has been partially attributed to the policy in two respects. First, the average Chinese household expends fewer resources, both in terms of time and money, on children, which gives many Chinese more money with which to invest. Second, since young Chinese can no longer rely on children to care for them in their old age, there is an impetus to save money for the future.

The original intent of the one-child policy was economic, to reduce the demand of natural resources, maintaining a steady labor rate, reducing unemployment caused from surplus labor, and reducing the rate of exploitation. Therefore, the policy be introduced quickly and covered wholeChina.